Saturday, November 9, 2019
Corruption in Sri Lanka
Corruption in Sri Lanka Free Online Research Papers The Offence of Corruption Bribery Act 70. Any public servant who, with intent, to cause wrongful or unlawful loss to the Government, or to confer a wrongful or unlawful benefit, favour or advantage on himself or any person, or with knowledge, that any wrongful or unlawful loss will be caused to any person or to the Government, or that any wrongful or unlawful benefit, favour or advantage will be conferred on any person- (a) does, or forbears to do, any act, which he is empowered to do by virtue of his office as a public servant; (b) induces any other public servant to perform, or refrain from performing, any act, which such other public servant is empowered to do by virtue of his office as a public servant; (c) uses any information coming to his knowledge by virtue of his office as a public servant; (d) participates in the making of any decision by virtue of his office as a public servant; (e) induces any other person, by the use, whether directly or indirectly, of his office as such public servant to perform, or refrain from performing, any act, shall be guilty of the offence of corruption and shall upon summary trial and conviction by a Magistrate be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or to a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand rupees or to both such imprisonment and fine. The analysis of section 70 of the Bribery act reveals that the offence of corruption is constituted by the following elements. 1. Public Servant 2. Committed the offence with the intention of causing the following; a. Wrongful or unlawful loss to the government; b. Wrongful or unlawful benefit, favour or advantage on himself or any other person 3. Or, Committed the offence with the knowledge that the following will take place; a. Wrongful or unlawful loss to the government or to any person b. Wrongful or unlawful benefit, favour or advantage on any person 4. Does one or more of the following; a. Does or forbears to do, any act which he is empowered which he is empowered to do by virtue his office as a public servant; b. induces any other public servant to perform, or refrain from performing any act, which such other public servant is empowered to do by virtue of his office as a public servant; c. uses any information coming to his knowledge by virtue of his office as a public servant; d. participates in the making of any decision by virtue of his office as a public servant; e. induces any other person, by the use, whether directly or indirectly, of his office as such public servant to perform, or refrain from performing, any act The mens rea element embedded in the definition warrant a further analysis. According to G.L. Peiris it is sufficient that the accused foresaw that this effect would be caused by the act which he resolves to commit . So long as the accused, with foresight of the consequences, has embarked on a particular course of conduct, it is immaterial to the issue of liability that the accused did not desire the consequences of his conduct. An objective attitude to intention is suggested by the principle that a man is deemed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts. However, a subjective approach to intention emerges unequivocally from the judgement Devasundara v Alahakoon . In the recent House of Lords decision on intention, R v Woollin , it was held that the jury must decide whether the accused intended the consequences of his action if the consequence was a virtual certainty and the defendant recognized it as such. In Westminster City Council v Croyagrange Ltd it was held that it was open to the tribunal of fact, when knowledge on the part of a defendant is required to be proved, to base a finding of knowledge on evidence that the Defendant had deliberately shut his eyes to the obvious or refrained from inquiry because he suspected the truth but did not want to have his suspicions confirmed. Research Papers on Corruption in Sri LankaUnreasonable Searches and SeizuresComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoThe Project Managment Office SystemBringing Democracy to AfricaStandardized TestingPETSTEL analysis of IndiaQuebec and CanadaRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into AsiaHonest Iagos Truth through Deception
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.